Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 16:48

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Oregon lands a commitment from one of the nation's top WRs Messiah Hampton - On3.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let's Weigh The Pros And Cons Of Inviting Larry David To Your Wedding - OutKick
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do flat-Earthers think the Earth is flat?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Blocking Brain Inflammation Molecule May Halt Alzheimer’s - Neuroscience News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Wine-Based Hangover Project Drops QEMU In Favor Of FEX & Box64 For Emulation - Phoronix
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.